26000 is the international standard created to help associations adequately
evaluate and address those social obligations that are relevant and significant
to their mission and vision, operations and processes; clients, representatives,
groups and different stakeholders and; and environment impact.
26000 standard provides guidance on:
seven key standards of social responsibilities, accountability, transparency,
moral conduct, regard for the control of law, regard for worldwide standards of
conduct and regard for human rights.
social responsibility and engaging stakeholders.
seven essential subjects and issues relating to social responsibility,
organizational governance, fair working practices, buyer issues, and community
contribution and development.
to integrate socially capable conduct into the organization.
as direction, not for accreditation/certification.
an extensive documentation of social responsibility including core subjects and
issues identified with those subjects.
in 2010 by the International Organization of Standardization (ISO), a specific
international agency for organizations made out of the national standards
bodies of more than 160 nations.
by a unique multi-sectoral group representing governments, no-administrative
organizations (NGO’s), industry, customer gatherings, work and other
associations around the world.
than 400 specialists and 200 observers from 99 nations and 42 universal
associations added to the improvement exertion. Lat explored for conceivable
correction in 2014, requirement for update will be thought about again in three
Benefits of ISO 26000
organization execution on social responsibility can impact among other things:
capacity to draw in and hold specialists or individuals, clients, customer and
maintenance of representative assurance, duty and efficiency.
impression of financial specialists, proprietors, benefactors, supports and the
money related groups.
with organizations, governments, the media, providers, companions, clients and
the group in which it works.
Strengths of ISO 26000
ISO 26000 Formation
One of the biggest strength of ISO
26000 is that it was produced through a procedure that included a wide
assortment of partners including industry, government, work, shoppers, and
non-governmental associations from both creating and created nations and was
endorsed by 94% of the National Standard Bodies that voted. It was produced by
a working gathering of around 500 specialists. The stakeholders were from more
than 90 different nations. At the production of this standard was disbanded.
Nonetheless, the initiative of he working gathering was held to offer help and
ability for clients. The expansive interest of partner bunches from an
assortment of segments is a quality for the ISO standard since it guarantees
that the standard mirrors the requirements and eliminations of the partners it
plans to lock in. It additionally makes it more probable that the standard will
have the capacity to meet its goal of supporting and promoting sustainable
development since it is grounded in the substances of stakeholders, including
companies. This is currently called the Post Publication Organization or PPO
for ISO 26000.
The ISO 26000 PPO has delivered the
accompanying document to help the usage of ISO 26000:
Protocol- Describes proper wordings that organizations can use to communicate
their utilization of ISO 26000.
26000 essential preparing materials as a Power Point and preparing convention
that connection ISO 26000 with the OECD guidelines for multinational
organizations and the UN agenda 2030 (Sustainable Development Goals).
for the systematic review of ISO 26000, due to begin in 15 January’2017.
Ease in Understanding the document
Another strength of ISO 26000 is
the comprehensive idea of the report. The ISO standard indicates to give
clients a structure that any association can use to assess their arrangements
and practices. ISO 26000 incorporates seven standards of social responsibility,
accountability, transparency, ethical behaviour, respect for stakeholder
interests, respect for the rule of law, respect for human rights (ISO 2010).
The record additionally incorporates seven center subject of social obligation,
hierarchical administration, human rights, labour practices, the environment,
fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement and
development (ISO 2010). These standards and core subjects speak to the heap
ways that companies affect supportable improvement and how they can carry on
ISO 26000 is very compatible
Another strength is that ISO 26000
is extremely compatible with other social responsibility initiatives and system
(Henriques, 2012). ISO 26000 is predictable with International Labor
Organization measures, the global compact, the global reporting initiative and
the organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s guidelines for
multinational enterprises to give some examples. The multiplication of social
responsibility and sustainability activities and guidelines can make perplexity
among partners so the way that ISO 26000 compliments other worldwide benchmarks
is beneficial. Joining ISO 26000 likewise improves the ISO standard by filling
some of its shortcoming with respect to consistence measures and detailing
prerequisites which are talked about in the following segment. ISO 26000 will incorporate
worldwide ability on social responsibility-what it implies, what issues an
organization needs to deliver keeping in mind the end goal to work in a
socially dependable way, and what is best practice in implementing SR. ISO
26000 will be an effective SR instrument to help organizations to move from
great aims to great activities.
ISO 26000 goodwill
ISO 26000 is being utilized
generally by companies as indicated by Ethical Corporation (Entine, July 11,
2014). The standard has picked up authentically and notoriety among
partnerships since it is a direction record instead of a legitimately
restricting standard. The secretary general to the ISO, Rob Steele, believes
this is precisely what is required by organizations (Entine, July 11, 2014).
Enterprises can utilize the standard at their own pace because of its voluntary
and non- binding nature. The widespread use of ISO 26000 is absolutely a
quality for the standard.
CSR Asia has additionally
complimented ISO 26000 for its flexibility to particular needs of an enterprise
or division (Bal, November 2nd, 2010). The expansive topics and
non-restricting nature of the archive enables partnerships to tailor the
standard to their particular needs or objectives and utilize a few zones of the
standard more than others depending the organization’s situation.
ISO 26000 Social Responsibility Standard launched
November 1, 2010 denoted the
official launch of ISO 26000- the social responsibility guidance created by the
International Organization for Standardization. The standard was propelled
following five years of work, which included 450 participating experts and 210
observers from 99 ISO member countries and 42 contact organizations. Created
with the dynamic inclusion of sic partner gatherings (industry, government,
work, shoppers, non-governmental organizations and administration support,
research and others), the standard gives rules (it isn’t a confirmation
standard) pertinent to any association – public or private, little or
extensive, situated in developed or developing countries.
ISO 26000 characterizes wat social
duty is and traces the seven primary standards of social responsibility,
accountability, transparency, ethical behaviour, respect for stakeholders interests,
respect for rule of law, respect for international norms of behaviour and
respect for human rights. It incorporates seven center social responsibility
branches of knowledge, nature, group contribution and development, human
rights, labor practices, customer issues and authoritative administration. A
key piece of the standard is the direction on the best way to coordinate social
responsibility all through an organization.
Weakness of ISO 26000
ISO 26000 differentiates from other ISO standards
26000 differentiates from other standards of ISO since it doesn’t provide
certification to companies and doesn’t need any consistence from enterprises. ISO
26000 does not require any survey methods, reviews, or reports. Thus, this
standard is a fragment of large discussion if it is elective and
non-restricting activity that is compelling or if they furnish organizations through
an advertising intention. An enterprise can undoubtedly abuse this standard by
guaranteeing that it clings to the report’s standards yet without really making
any change in their strategies or performances. Truth be told, a few institutions
have guaranteed that they are part of ISO 26000 that is ensured as the official
document is not referred as a certification. It seems that these organizations
are simply looking for approaches to delude or misdirect its clients and seems
to be more dependable than its competitors.
ISO 26000 is too complex
Another weakness of ISO 26000 is
that the document is excessively perplexing for little and medium enterprises
to interpret and implement into their exercises since they don’t have a similar
time and assets that bigger organizations need to participate in such an
extensive endeavour. Conspicuous assumes that they have put forth such
expressions incorporate John Ruggie, former special representative to the
Secretary General on Business and Human Rights, Francesco Marchi, Director
General of the European Apparel and Textile Confederation and Brent Wilton,
Deputy Secretary General of the International Employers Organizations (Zarcostas,
June 10th, 2010). Oshani
Perera of the International Institute for Sustainable Development contends that
ISO 26000 does not address the issue of small and medium enterprises in
creating nations since it does not reflect the additional challenges these
ventures confront (Oshani, September 2008).
ISO 26000 misused by many certification services
ISO developer of the newly
distributed ISO 26000 standard giving direction on social responsibility, is
fortifying the point that ISO 26000 can’t be and may not be utilized for
confirmation. ISO demonstrates that it will make a move against cases of affirmation
to the standard. However, ISO 26000 isn’t an administration framework standard
and particularly does not contain necessities against which an association or
its administration framework could be examined and ensured. ISO 26000 gives
direction on what social responsibility is and how associations can work in a
socially responsible way.
Further, the extent of ISO 26000
makes it clear that it isn’t to be utilized for certification, expressing “This
international standard isn’t an administration framework standard. It isn’t
proposed or fitting for certification purposes or administrative or
authoritative use. Any offer to affirm, or claims to be confirmed to ISO 26000
would be distortion of the aim and reason and an abuse of this international
standard. As this international standard does not contain prerequisites, any
such certification would not be a showing of similarity with this universal
standard.” ISO 26000 expressly expresses what it isn’t expected or proper for
certification and any confirmation would be a misuse to the standard.
Thus, certification bodies are
emphatically encouraged not to elevate or give certification o ISO 26000 and
accreditation bodies and certification bodies are asked for the report any
misuse or requirement for confirmation to the ISO central secretariat.
Sustainable business for
organizations implies not just products and services that fulfil the clients
and doing as such without imperilling the environment, yet in addition working
in a socially respectful way. Pressure to do as such originates from clients,
customers, governments, affiliations and the public. At the same time far
located organizational leaders perceive that enduring achievement must be based
on trustworthy business practices such as anticipation of exercises for example
fake bookkeeping and work misuse. From one perspective, there has been various
announcements of standard identified with SR and on the other hand there are
numerous individuals SR programs and initiatives.
ISO’s mastery is in creating
harmonized worldwide understandings among the principle stakeholders, among
nations (ISO is a network of the national standards of 157 countries).
The future ISO 26000 will distil a
globally relevant understanding of what social responsibility is and what
organizations need to do to work in a socially responsible way.