Another the people because he had no experience

Another contribution to the poor opinion of the
Tsar was that there was very little experience in government.  Even before he came into
power the Tsar knew he was not prepared to rule over Russia. Shortly after he
came into power the Tsar wrote in 1894, “I am not prepared to be the Tsar.
I never wanted to become one. I know nothing of the business of ruling.” This shows the very little experience that Nicholas II
had. An example of this is after he had become the Tsar, he decided to fire his
uncle, Nicolai, as commander-in-chief. After many defeats, he led the army very
poorly. However, it was not surprising to the people because he had no
experience whatsoever.  This only raised
tensions in the army, and undermined Nicholas II. The defeats made it easy to
argue that his removal was a way to secure victory for Russia. People quickly
started to realize the Tsar was far from suitable to hold the Russian throne
and that something had to be done to secure Russia’s reputation. An example of
this is, “None of the military decisions made
between his assumption of command and his abdication in 1916 owed anything to
his input. Instead, familiarity bred neglect. The tsar was no longer a figure
of awe and mystery.”  This proves that Russia’s strong reputation was
slowly getting weaker. Nicholas’ reputation led countries to believe that it
was a good time to take advantage of Russia’s vulnerability at the time. Specifically,
to the French and British governments, it was deemed as a good opportunity to
battle the tsar’s government. One of the French General Staff stated, “One key
to the salvation of France lay in immediately setting the Russian colossus in
motion” (Massie, 2000).  While the Tsar
was taking care of war measures he left his wife authority over Russian
government, this proved to be a poor decision as she had just as little
experience as him with a very bad reputation from the people.  This frustrated the Russian’s because they were
not only being misled on the battlefields but mislead in their own country as well,
due to extreme lack of experience. Many believed that Alexandra would complete the
devastation of the Russian’s. This had proven to be the last straw for the
Russians as it also bothered the people that a woman was in charge, let alone a
German- born one. Her bad reputation just added to the conflict in Russia
because it was believed that Alexandra was used to help Germany while
backstabbing Russia.

 

 

         Lastly, many incidents that the Tsar may
have neglected to think about or miscalculated were conducted poorly.  “Nicholas was raised in the Imperial Family where monarchs wielded power
over, but didn’t talk to, their subjects. Unless it was opportune, rulers
rarely looked at the living and working conditions of the ruled.” This
suggests that had the Tsar talked to his subjects, he would have understood the desperation of the poor and had he visited
some of the factories, he would have seen the terrible conditions and could
have potentially altered the way things were going in Russia. Tsar Nicholas was
known to be a stubborn man. Stuck in his ways, the Russians felt there was no
room for change in Russia for as long as the Tsar was in charge. For example, “By
insisting on old ways of the past, he wrote himself out of a place in the
future.” This shows that if he
had tried to make improvements to the Russian Empire there would have been a
bright new Empire for Russia to grow into. Some reasons this failed to happen
was because he failed to grasp that his country and he needed some measure of
change. As well, he didn’t realize that the Russian system was beginning to
take a toll. Lastly, once the impulse of radical change had started he was
ineffective in trying to stop it. “To
celebrate his marriage to Alexandra, Nicholas held a customary banquet for
his subjects. This traditional wedding feast turned into a stampeding mass of
humanity as people – trying to grab morsels of food – crushed each other.” After
the banquet was finished many people died, and
Nicholas was criticized for not canceling plans to attend a celebratory ball in
his honor. His uncles encouraged him to attend the ball, because they felt it
would be rude not to attend. It was unprofessional and not appropriate for a
man like the Tsar to throw such a banquet without thinking about the
repercussions this event may have, therefore; it left a very bad impression on
the Tsar by his people.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

 

      
Russia has been forever changed since the revolution. The Tsar had a
public opinion that was negative by most which led to the Revolution. His
personality and weak-minded nature created complications for him because he
neglected to notice and attempt to create many situations thoughtfully. His
solutions to “fixing” Russia made it so much more noticeable that he had very
little previous experience in government and in fact made things worse. This in
turn meant that he was a constant symbol of Russia’s failings which led to
vulnerability throughout Russia. After
Lenin’s government secured power, one of its first major goals was to get
Russia out of the War. After his Decree on Peace, Lenin sent out
diplomatic notes to all participants in the war, calling for everyone to stop
fighting immediately if they did not want Russia to seek a separate peace. The
effort was ignored. On December 15, Russia signed an armistice with
Germany and Austria, pending a formal peace treaty. Russia’s exit from the war
was very costly, but Lenin was desperate to end the war at any cost, as the
Germans were threatening to invade Petrograd. In the peace, Lenin consented to
give up most of Russia’s territorial gains. Eventually, the Soviets would
regain these territories at the end of World War II. However, Russia remains a
communist country with arguably more issues now than ever before.

x

Hi!
I'm Isaac!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out