Apoptosis cell to disassemble without damaging any of

Apoptosis (from
the Greek word “falling off”) is a term that was first introduced by the
pathologists Kerr, Wyllie and Currie to describe the process by which a cell
induces its own death. This process is crucial for the maintenance of healthy
tissues since it prevents the growth of damaged cells and allows the body to
remove any potential dangerous cells (Elmore 2007). It also balances cell
division, thus inhibiting tissues from growing or decreasing in size (Alberts 2002).

Cell death through apoptosis is mediated by a series of proteases that cleave
key proteins inside the cell such as the nuclear lamins. The proteases promote
the activation of a DNase which is able to cut the DNA allowing the cell to
disassemble without damaging any of the neighboring cells (Alberts 2002).

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

Here, house became community property according to

Here, Husband insisted that the house
was purchased with the title of joint tenancy, thus, it’s community property. The
wife asserted that the reason of buying with the title of joint tenancy was
advised by realtor because of tax. When she took the house, husband consented
verbally that the house was hers. Husband said that he didn’t tell the house is
her house and there was no evidence. However, their children told that he
several times told that the house is one of the wife. Husband rebut that according
to the Civil Code, his oral agreement would not be effective
because the oral agreement cannot overcome the presumption that property
acquired during marriage in
joint tenancy is community property. Thus, the purchasing money was only
separate money, but increasing money after purchasing would be community
property. The Court found that the issue is whether the law of the Civil Code section is able to apply
this case with retroactive. The Court held that even though the intention of the Civil Code is applying with
retroactive, the law would be unconstitutional because retroactive application
of this law deprives the wife of her vested property right. If the house became
community property according to the Civil
Code, it would violate the due process of law.

 

x

Hi!
I'm Isaac!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out